NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC. v. THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

Civil No. 1:02cv785-HSO-JCG.

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., f/k/a INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., Plaintiff, SIDNEY A. BACKSTROM, et al., Intervenor Plaintiffs, v. THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, and BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division.

April 6, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Joseph F. Coyne, Jr. , SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, Kenneth A. O'Brien, Jr. , SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, Richard P. Salloum , FRANKE & SALLOUM, PLLC, Carl J. Nichols , WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE & DORR, LLP, pro hac vice, J. Thomas Hamrick, Jr. , HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. & Traci M. Castille , FRANKE & SALLOUM, PLLC.

Sidney A. Backstrom, Scruggs Law Firm, P.A., Richard F. Scruggs, Zach scruggs & Attorney George Shaddock, Intervenor Plaintiffs, represented by George S. Shaddock , GEORGE S. SHADDOCK, ATTORNEY & David W. Shelton , DAVID SHELTON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by George S. Shaddock , GEORGE S. SHADDOCK, ATTORNEY.

The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Venezuela, Defendant, represented by Rodney Quinn Smith, II , GST, LLP, pro hac vice.

Bank of New York, Defendant, represented by Richard B. Tubertini , HAILEY, MCNAMARA, HALL, LARMANN & PAPALE, LLP & Eric A. Schaffer , REED SMITH, LLP, pro hac vice.

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Joseph F. Coyne, Jr. , SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, Kenneth A. O'Brien, Jr. , SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, Richard P. Salloum , FRANKE & SALLOUM, PLLC & Traci M. Castille , FRANKE & SALLOUM, PLLC.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION [369] TO VACATE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate the Preliminary Injunction [369], and good cause appearing, the Unopposed Motion is granted.

It is Ordered that the Preliminary Injunction ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases