1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 307 F.Supp.3d
  5. 307 F.Supp.3d 38 (2018)
 

MUJO v. JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

No. 3:16-cv-1990 (VAB).

307 F.Supp.3d 38 (2018)

Simon MUJO and Indrit Muharremi, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Jani-King Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

Signed March 31, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Delano, Pro Hac Vice, Shannon Liss-Riordan, Pro Hac Vice, Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, MA, Richard Eugene Hayber, Lori Ann Knuth, The Hayber Law Firm LLC, Hartford, CT, Anthony J. Pantuso, III, Law Offices of Anthony J. Pantuso, III, Milford, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Alison G. Fox, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, South Bend, IN, Kerry L. Bundy, Pro Hac Vice, Larry E. LaTarte, Pro Hac Vice, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Peter Joseph Murphy, Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Hartford, CT, for Defendants.

RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Simon Mujo and Indrit Muharremi, on behalf of a putative class of over 100 Jani-King franchisees (collectively "Plaintiffs"), have sued Jani-King International, Inc., Jani-King, Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc. (collectively "Jani-King"). In this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases