ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT TO REPLY"
Re: Dkt. No. 22
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff's "motion to require defendant to reply" is DENIED as unnecessary. Defendant has timely filed a motion for summary judgment as directed by the Court in its October 31, 2017 scheduling order. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.