1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION v. TST WATER, LLC
 

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION v. TST WATER, LLC

Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-01528-JRG.

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TST WATER, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

March 29, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W Faulkner, [email protected], Mediator, pro se.

Whirlpool Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Allen Franklin Gardner , Allen Gardner Law, PLLC, Barbara Nora Barath , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Bita Rahebi , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Christopher Jamieson Kendall , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Claire Abernathy Henry , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC, David Thomas Bower , Nyemaster Goode, PC, Jeffrey David Harty , Nyemaster Goode, PC, Rachel Silverman Dolphin , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Richard S.J. Hung , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Thomas John Ward, Jr. , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC & Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP.

TST Water, LLC, Defendant, represented by John B. Sganga, Jr. , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, Justin James Gillett , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, Sean Michael Murray , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, Kimberly Kennedy , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP & Elizabeth L. DeRieux , Capshaw DeRieux LLP.

TST Water, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Elizabeth L. DeRieux , Capshaw DeRieux LLP.

Whirlpool Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael A. Jacobs , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Barbara Nora Barath , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Christopher Jamieson Kendall , Morrison & Foerster LLP, David Thomas Bower , Nyemaster Goode, PC, Jeffrey David Harty , Nyemaster Goode, PC, Richard S.J. Hung , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant TST Water, LLC's ("TST") Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Dkt. No. 171) ("the Motion"). In the Motion, TST moves for judgment as a matter of law of no infringement of the '894 patent and that Whirlpool is not entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases