1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EnerPOL, LLC v. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
 

EnerPOL, LLC v. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Case No. 2:17-CV-00394-JRG.

ENERPOL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

March 15, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EnerPol, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Brianna Lee Chamberlin , Fish & Richardson, Conrad Gosen , Fish & Richardson, Jane J. Du , Fish & Richardson P.C., Jason Zucchi , Fish & Richardson, Leonard Davis , Fish & Richardson, Mathias W. Samuel , Fish & Richardson, Michael E. Florey , Fish & Richardson, Nitika Gupta Fiorella , Fish & Richardson P.C., Robert P. Courtney , Fish & Richardson, Tasha M. Francis , Fish & Richardson, William Ellsworth Davis, III , The Davis Firm, PC & Ruffin B. Cordell , Fish & Richardson PC.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Defendant, represented by Claire Abernathy Henry , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC, David A. Zucker , Latham & Watkins LLP, Gregory K. Sobolski , Latham & Watkins LLP, Herman H. Yue , Latham & Watkins LLP, Thomas John Ward , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC & Maximilian Antony Grant , Latham & Watkins LLP.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by David A. Zucker , Latham & Watkins LLP, Gregory K. Sobolski , Latham & Watkins LLP, Herman H. Yue , Latham & Watkins LLP, Maximilian Antony Grant , Latham & Watkins LLP, Claire Abernathy Henry , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC & Thomas John Ward , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC.

EnerPol, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Jane J. Du , Fish & Richardson P.C., Jason Zucchi , Fish & Richardson, Mathias W. Samuel , Fish & Richardson, Tasha M. Francis , Fish & Richardson, Ruffin B. Cordell , Fish & Richardson PC, Conrad Gosen , Fish & Richardson, Leonard Davis , Fish & Richardson, Michael E. Florey , Fish & Richardson, Robert P. Courtney , Fish & Richardson & William Ellsworth Davis, III , The Davis Firm, PC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On February 28, 2018, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 6,949,491 ("the '491 Patent). The Court has considered the arguments made by the Parties at the hearing and in their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases