1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. VIDRIO v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES
 

VIDRIO v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES

Case No. 1:17-cv-00407-DAD-EPG.

AMY VIDRIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, Defendant

United States District Court, E.D. California.

March 15, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy Vidrio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Adrian R. Bacon , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. & Todd M. Friedman , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C.

Rash Curtis & Associates, Defendant, represented by Mark E. Ellis , Ellis Law Group, LLP & David Elias Castro , Ellis Law Group, LLP.

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS BY THIRTY DAYS

(ECF NO. 14)

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the time to file dismissal documents is extended to April 16, 2018.

IT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases