1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC.
 

COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC.

No. 3:17-cv-01781-HZ.

COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, v. SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC., a Utah corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

March 13, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Brenna K. Legaard , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice, Brian Jeffrey Nese , Stoel Rives LLP, David Robert Boyajian , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Nicholas F. Aldrich, Jr. , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice, Sara Kobak , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice, Scott D. Eads , Schwabe Williamson and Wyatt & David W. Axelrod , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice.

Seirus Innovative Accessories, a Utah corporation, Defendant, represented by Christopher Scott Marchese , Fish and Richardson, Garrett K. Sakimae , Fish & Richardson P.C., pro hac vice, Seth M. Sproul , Fish and Richardson, pro hac vice, Tucker N. Terhufen , Fish & Richardson, pro hac vice, Michael Ari Amon , Fish and Richardson, Oliver James Richards , Fish & Richardson & Renee E. Rothauge , Markowitz, Herbold, Glade and Mehlhaf.

Seirus Innovative Accessories, a Utah corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Christopher Scott Marchese , Fish and Richardson, Garrett K. Sakimae , Fish & Richardson P.C., pro hac vice, Seth M. Sproul , Fish and Richardson, pro hac vice, Tucker N. Terhufen , Fish & Richardson, pro hac vice & Renee E. Rothauge , Markowitz, Herbold, Glade and Mehlhaf.

Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Brenna K. Legaard , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice, Brian Jeffrey Nese , Stoel Rives LLP, David Robert Boyajian , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Nicholas F. Aldrich, Jr. , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice, Sara Kobak , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice & David W. Axelrod , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., pro hac vice.

OPINION & ORDER

Before the Court are the parties' renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") and motions for a new trial [420 & 422] under Rules 50 and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 50, a party may file a JMOL if it "has been fully heard on an issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases