1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MELCHIOR v. HILITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 

MELCHIOR v. HILITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-3094-M (BH).

JEAN MELCHIOR, Plaintiff, v. HILITE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

February 23, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Property Rights: Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jean Melchior, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas C. Wright , Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Alex Joseph Whitman , Cunningham Swaim, PLLC, M. Ross Cunningham , Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Nicolas Seckel , Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian LLP, pro hac vice, Scott M. Daniels , Westerman Hattori Daniels and Adrian LLP & Steven D. Sanfelippo , Cunningham Swaim LLP.

Hilite International Inc, Defendant, represented by John M. DiMatteo , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Amy Sims Bowen , Hunton & Williams, Eugene L. Chang , Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, pro hac vice, John C. Eichman , Hunton & Williams LLP, Karen A. Sebaski , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin William Brooks , Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. & Marc E. Montgomery , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP.

Hilite International Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by John M. DiMatteo , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Amy Sims Bowen , Hunton & Williams, Eugene L. Chang , Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, pro hac vice, John C. Eichman , Hunton & Williams LLP, Karen A. Sebaski , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin William Brooks , Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. & Marc E. Montgomery , Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP.

Jean Melchior, Counter Defendant, represented by Thomas C. Wright , Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Alex Joseph Whitman , Cunningham Swaim, PLLC, M. Ross Cunningham , Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Nicolas Seckel , Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian LLP, pro hac vice & Scott M. Daniels , Westerman Hattori Daniels and Adrian LLP.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases