COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION v. ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY

No. 2:17-cv-01212-RSL.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

January 11, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew J. Segal , PACIFIC LAW GROUP LLP, Paul J. Lawrence , PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP & Nicholas William Brown , PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP.

Arrowood Indemnity Company, a North Carolina company, as successor in interest to Royal Insurance Company of America, Defendant, represented by Alexander E. Potente , CLYDE & CO US LLP.


STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2), Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation ("Costco") and Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company ("Arrowood"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the entry of a Protective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases