IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION

Case No. 13-cv-03072-EMC.

291 F.Supp.3d 936 (2018)

IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed February 14, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer Whalen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt, DiCello Levitt & Casey LLC, Cory Steven Fein, Attorney at Law Cory Fein Law Firm, Craig Ripley Spiegel, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Cynthia B. Chapman, Caddell & Chapman, Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Benjamin F. Johns, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Catherine Gannon, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, pro hac vice, Gregory Michael Travalio, Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, pro hac vice, James C. Shah, Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP, Jason Allen Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff D. Friedman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeffrey Scott Goldenberg, Goldenberg Schneider, LPA, pro hac vice, Jeniphr A.E. Breckenridge, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, John Ernst Tangren, DiCello Levitt & Casey LLC, pro hac vice, Joseph B. Kennedy, pro hac vice, Joseph Bryce Kenney, McCuneWright LLP, Joseph G. Sauder, McCuneWright, LLP, Justin James Hawal pro hac vice, Mark Philip Pifko, Baron & Budd, P.C., Mark Hayden Troutman, Isaac Wiles Burkholder Teetor, Matthew David Schelkopf, McCuneWright LLP, Nicholas E. Chimicles, Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Roland K. Tellis, Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith, Hagens Berman, pro hac vice, Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, pro hac vice, Tyler S. Weaver, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, pro hac vice & Vincent Louis DiTommaso, DiTommaso Lubin, P.C.

Thomas Mitchell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Craig Ripley Spiegel, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Benjamin F. Johns, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Jeff D. Friedman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy, pro hac vice, Justin James Hawal pro hac vice, Mark Philip Pifko, Baron & Budd, P.C., Nicholas E. Chimicles, Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Roland K. Tellis, Baron Budd, P.C., Stephanie Elena Saunders, Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, pro hac vice & Vincent Louis DiTommaso, DiTommaso Lubin, P.C.

Joe D'Aguanno, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Deb Makowski, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jose Randy Rodriguez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated & Michael Ervin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, represented by Adam J. Levitt, DiCello Levitt & Casey LLC, Craig Ripley Spiegel, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Shana E. Scarlett, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Benjamin F. Johns, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory Michael Travalio, Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, pro hac vice, Jason Allen Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff D. Friedman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy, pro hac vice, Justin James Hawal pro hac vice, Mark Philip Pifko, Baron & Budd, P.C., Nicholas E. Chimicles, Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Roland K. Tellis, Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith, Hagens Berman, pro hac vice, Stephanie Elena Saunders, Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, pro hac vice, Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, pro hac vice & Vincent Louis DiTommaso, DiTommaso Lubin, P.C.

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Randall W. Edwards, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Brian Christopher Anderson, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Edmundo Clay Marquez, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Jaime Arturo Saenz, Colvin Chaney Saenz Rodriguez LLP, pro hac vice, Janet L. Conigliaro, DYKEMA, Scott M. Hammack, O'Melveny and Myers, pro hac vice & Warren Earl Platt, Snell and Wilmer LLP.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket No. 341

The crux of this case is that Ford's infotainment system known as MyFord Touch was allegedly defective. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of the certified classes in the form of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases