SMART WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. FITBIT INC.

Case No. 17-cv-05068-VC.

SMART WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. FITBIT INC, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 1, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smart Wearable Technologies Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan T. Suder , Friedman Suder & Cooke, pro hac vice, Justin Manning Wolcott , Obenshain Law Group, Mark D. Obenshain , Obenshain Law Group, Richard Allen Wojcio, Jr. , Friedman, Suder and Cooke, pro hac vice, Corby R. Vowell , Friedman, Suder & Cooke, PC & Lewis Emery Hudnell, III , Hudnell Law Group PC.

Fitbit Inc, Defendant, represented by Clement Seth Roberts , Durie Tangri LLP, Clement Seth Roberts , Durie Tangri LLP, pro hac vice, Eugene Novikov , Durie Tangri LLP, pro hac vice, James S. Tsuei , Durie Tangri, LLP, pro hac vice, Timothy Chen Saulsbury , Durie Tangri LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Chen Saulsbury , Durie Tangri LLP.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 80

Fitbit's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement against Smart Wearable Technologies ("SWT") is granted.

The accused devices, the Fitbit Blaze and the Fitbit Surge, are "activity trackers" — watch-like...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases