1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LUSK v. AKRADI
 

LUSK v. AKRADI

Civil No. 15-1911 (JRT/BRT).

MATTHEW LUSK and ST. CLAIR EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BAHRAM AKRADI, GILES H. BATEMAN, JACK W. EUGSTER, GUY C. JACKSON, JOHN K. LLOYD, MARTHA A. MORFITT, JOHN B. RICHARDS, and JOSEPH S. VASSALLUZZO, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

January 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Lusk, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Brant D. Penney, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, Carl F. Engstrom, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Christopher Chagas Gold, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, pro hac vice, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, Jacob A. Walker, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, James M. Ficaro, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C., pro hac vice, Jason M. Leviton, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, Jeffrey C. Block, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, Kai H. Richter, Nichols Kaster, PLLP & Stuart A. Davidson, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP, pro hac vice.

St. Clair Employees' Retirement System, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Brant D. Penney, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, Carl F. Engstrom, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Christopher Chagas Martins, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, pro hac vice, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, pro hac vice, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, Jacob A. Walker, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, James M. Ficaro, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C., pro hac vice, Jason M. Leviton, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, Jeffrey C. Block, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, Kai H. Richter, Nichols Kaster, PLLP & Stuart A. Davidson, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP, pro hac vice.

Bahram Akradi, Defendant, represented by Caitlin L.D. Hull, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, James K. Nichols, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Lincoln Loehrke, Dorsey & Whitney LLP & Thomas P. Swigert, Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

Giles H. Bateman, Jack W. Eugster, Guy C. Jackson, John K. Lloyd, Martha A. Morfitt, John B. Richards & Joseph S. Vassalluzzo, Defendants, represented by Cicely R. Miltich, Faegre Baker Daniels, Justin P. Krypel, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Lauren W. Linderman, Faegre Baker Daniels, Matthew B. Kilby, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP & Wendy J. Wildung, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.

Leonard Green & Partners L.P., Defendant, represented by Bret A. Puls, Fox Rothschild LLP, Carrie Baker Anderson, Fox Rothschild LLP, Ellie J. Barragry, Fox Rothschild LLP & Michele D. Johnson, Latham & Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.

TPG Capital, L.P., Defendant, represented by Bret A. Puls, Fox Rothschild LLP, Carrie Baker Anderson, Fox Rothschild LLP, Christopher G. Green, Ropes & Gray LLP, pro hac vice, Ellie J. Barragry, Fox Rothschild LLP & Martin J. Crisp, Ropes & Gray LLP, pro hac vice.

LKN Partners, Defendant, represented by Frank A. Taylor, Briggs & Morgan, PA, Matthew Solum, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, pro hac vice & Ross L. Weiner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

St. Clair County Employees' Retirement System, Movant, represented by Danielle S. Myers, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, pro hac vice, David T. Wissbroecker, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, Jason M. Leviton, Block & Leviton LLP, pro hac vice, Kai H. Richter, Nichols Kaster, PLLP & Stuart A. Davidson, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT AND FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

Plaintiffs Matthew Lusk and the St. Clair County Employees' Retirement System (collectively, "Plaintiffs") are former shareholders of Life Time Fitness, Inc. ("Life Time"). Defendant Bahram Akradi was Life...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases