1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FERGUSON v. QUICKEN LOANS
 

FERGUSON v. QUICKEN LOANS

Case No. 5:17-cv-458-MHH.

DANNY FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. QUICKEN LOANS, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division.

January 26, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Negotiable Instrument
Nature of Suit: 140 Negotiable Instrument
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danny Ferguson, (Nul Tiel Corporation), Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Quicken Loans, Defendant, represented by T. Dylan Reeves, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

In this action, pro se plaintiff Danny Ferguson contends that an employee of defendant Quicken Loans coerced him to sign a promissory note. Mr. Ferguson asserts state law claims against Quicken Loans for breach of contract and void contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases