1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BRISCOE v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
 

BRISCOE v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY

Case No. 2:17-cv-04832-JAK (JPRx).

KEVIN BRISCOE, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; and DOES 1-20; Inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 19, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Briscoe, Plaintiff, represented by Alvin L. Pittman , Alvin L. Pittman Law Offices.

Starbucks Corporation, dba Starbucks Coffee Company doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company Erroneously Sued As Starbucks Corporation Erroneously Sued As Starbucks Coffee Company as separate entities, Defendant, represented by Jyoti Mittal , Littler Mendelson PC & Tanja L. Darrow , Littler Mendelson PC.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

[DISCOVERY MATTER]

PURPOSE OF STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

The Parties to this action anticipate that the discovery phase of this matter may involve the disclosure of material protected under the constitutional, statutory, or common law right to privacy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases