CLAY v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3

No. 2:17-cv-00749 KJM GGH PS.

JEROME A CLAY, Plaintiff, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

December 22, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome A. Clay, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3, Defendant, represented by Daniel M. Combs , Campbell Litigation, P.C, Ryan Nicholas Dunlevy , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson & Stephen W. Robertson , Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER

Defendant, hereafter AT&T, has moved to dismiss plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (SAC), erroneously referenced by plaintiff as the Third Amended Complaint. The Motion to Dismiss is multi-faceted, but one of the primary grounds focused on an alleged failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases