1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 288 F.Supp.3d
  5. 288 F.Supp.3d 1002 (2017)
 

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. QUANTIFICARE INC.

Case No. 17-CV-03061-LHK.

288 F.Supp.3d 1002 (2017)

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUANTIFICARE INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

Signed December 19, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julianne Marie Hartzell, Tron Yue Fu, Thomas L. Duston, Marshall Gerstein Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, Megan O'Neill, Willenken Wilson Loh & Delgado LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Robert Warren Payne, Payne IP Law, San Jose, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 35

Plaintiffs Procter & Gamble Co. ("P&G") and Canfield Scientific, Inc. ("Canfield") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant QuantifiCare Inc. ("QuantifiCare")....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases