1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 281 F.Supp.3d
  5. 281 F.Supp.3d 743 (2017)
 

NORTON v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD

No. 13-3316.

281 F.Supp.3d 743 (2017)

Don NORTON and Karen Otterson, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

Signed December 14, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark G. Weinberg, 3612 N. Tripp Ave., Chicago, IL 60641, Adele D. Nicholas, 111 W. Washington, Ste. 1500, Chicago, IL 60602, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Nathan Edward Rice & Steven C. Rahn, City of Springfield, Room 313 Municipal Center East, 800 E. Monroe, Springfield, IL 62701, Attorneys for Defendant.

OPINION

This case is about the First Amendment and attorney's fees.

Let us start at the beginning.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Plaintiffs-Don Norton and Karen Otterson-challenged the constitutionality of § 131.06(e) of the City of Springfield Municipal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases