1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. INSTITUUT VOOR LANDBOUW - EN VISSERIJONDERZOEK
 

E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. INSTITUUT VOOR LANDBOUW - EN VISSERIJONDERZOEK

Case No. 1:17-cv-00808-DAD-EPG.

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INSTITUUT VOOR LANDBOUW — EN VISSERIJONDERZOEK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

November 8, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. & J. Gallo Winery, Plaintiff, represented by D. Greg Durbin , Martin Law Firm.

E. & J. Gallo Winery, Plaintiff, represented by Seth Reed Sias , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, William Frederick Abrams , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Jamie Lucia , Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Sanjeet Kumar Dutta , Steptoe & Johnson LLP.

G3 Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by D. Greg Durbin , Martin Law Firm, Seth Reed Sias , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, William Frederick Abrams , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Jamie Lucia , Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Sanjeet Kumar Dutta , Steptoe & Johnson LLP.

MCD Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by D. Greg Durbin , Martin Law Firm, Sanjeet Kumar Dutta , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Seth Reed Sias , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, William Frederick Abrams , Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Jamie Lucia , Steptoe & Johnson LLP.

Instituut Voor Landbouw - En Visserijonderzoek, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R. Chanin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Matthew Mickle Werdegar , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Briggs Matheson , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Eigen Vermogen Vh Instituut Voor Landbouw - En Visserijonderzoek, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R. Chanin , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Matthew Mickle Werdegar , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Briggs Matheson , Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT FLANDERS FOOD

(ECF No. 30)

On November 8, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation voluntary dismissal of Defendant Flanders Food without prejudice. (ECF No. 30). Thus, the claims against Defendant Flanders Food have been terminated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases