COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Nos. C16-0950RSL, C17-01209RSL

THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, Plaintiff, v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, and TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC., Intervenors. CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, Plaintiff, SCHEDULING v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

November 7, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
Cause: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Center for Food Safety, Plaintiff, represented by Amy van Saun , CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, pro hac vice.

Center for Food Safety, Plaintiff, represented by George A. Kimbrell , CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendant, represented by Dedra S. Curteman , US DEPT. OF JUSTICE, Kent E. Hanson , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE SECTION & Peter K. Dykema , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENRD GENERAL LITIGATION.

Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite, Defendant, represented by Dedra S. Curteman , US DEPT. OF JUSTICE, Kent E. Hanson , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE SECTION & Peter K. Dykema , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENRD GENERAL LITIGATION.

Major General Scott A. Spellmon, Defendant, represented by Dedra S. Curteman , US DEPT. OF JUSTICE, Kent E. Hanson , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE SECTION & Peter K. Dykema , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENRD GENERAL LITIGATION.

Colonel Mark A. Geraldi, Defendant, represented by Dedra S. Curteman , US DEPT. OF JUSTICE, Kent E. Hanson , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE SECTION & Peter K. Dykema , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ENRD GENERAL LITIGATION.

Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Amanda Morse Carr , PLAUCHE & CARR LLP, Samuel Wilmore Plauche, IV , PLAUCHE & CARR LLP & Jesse G. DeNike , PLAUCHE & CARR LLP.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' "Stipulated Motion to Consolidate Actions" filed in C16-0950RSL. Dkt. # 30. Having reviewed the motion SCHEDULING ORDER and the proposed order, it appears that the parties wish to have the two abovecaptioned matters heard on a coordinated schedule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases