1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. INFANTE v. LUXOTTICA RETAIL
 

INFANTE v. LUXOTTICA RETAIL

No. C 17-05145 WHA.

KATHLEEN INFANTE, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LUXOTTICA RETAIL, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 370 Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Infante, Plaintiff, represented by Charles Philip Reichmann , Law Offices of Charles Reichman.

Kathleen Infante, Plaintiff, represented by Sally M. Handmaker , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Andrew N. Friedman , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Geoffrey Graber , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Robert Gordon , Greitzer & Locks, Steven G. Calamusa , Gordon and Doner PA & Theodore J. Leopold , Cohen Milstein.

Luxottica Retail North America, Defendant, represented by Harrison Brown , Blank Rome LLP.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND VACATING HEARING

Section 1404(a) of Title 28 of the United States Code provides that "[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases