1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HEMP, INC.
 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HEMP, INC.

Case No. 2:16-cv-1413.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. HEMP, INC. a Colorado Corporation; BRUCE J. PERLOWIN, an individual; BARRY K. EPLING, an individual; JED M. PERLOWIN, an individual; FERRIS HOLDING, INC., a private Nevada Corporation; HOBBES EQUITIES INC., a private Nevada Corporation; DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LLC, a private Nevada Limited Liability Company; and QUANTUM ECONOMIC PROTOCOLS LLC, a private Nevada Limited Liability Company. Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

October 31, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities/Commodities
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Securities & Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Wadley .

Securities & Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, represented by James J. Thibodeau & Amy J. Oliver , U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Hemp, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP, Thomas Sporkin , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice, Timothy J. Coley , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice & David J. Freeman , Holland Hart LLP.

Bruce Perlowin, Defendant, represented by Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP, Thomas Sporkin , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice, Timothy J. Coley , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice & David J. Freeman , Holland Hart LLP.

Ferris Holding, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP & David J. Freeman , Holland Hart LLP.

Hobbes Equities, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP & David J. Freeman , Holland Hart LLP.

Barry K. Epling, Defendant, represented by Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP, Thomas Sporkin , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice, Timothy J. Coley , Buckley Sandler LLP, pro hac vice & David J. Freeman , Holland Hart LLP.

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE AND REPLY DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiffs and Certain Defendants herein, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases