1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KIMM v. BRANNAN
 

KIMM v. BRANNAN

No. 2:14-cv-1966 JWS.

Jack Kimm, Plaintiff, v. Martin Brannan, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

October 25, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Kimm, Plaintiff, represented by Joy Malby Bertrand , Joy Bertrand Esq LLC.

Martin Brannan, Defendant, represented by Michael Warzynski , Jardine Baker Hickman & Houston PLLC.

Samuel Verderman, Defendant, represented by Michael Warzynski , Jardine Baker Hickman & Houston PLLC.

Frank Haws, Defendant, represented by Michael Warzynski , Jardine Baker Hickman & Houston PLLC.

Thomas Jones, Defendant, represented by Michael Warzynski , Jardine Baker Hickman & Houston PLLC.

La Paz, County of, Defendant, represented by Michael Warzynski , Jardine Baker Hickman & Houston PLLC.

ORDER AND OPINION

I. MOTION PRESENTED

At docket 144, Defendants Martin Brannan, Samuel Verderman, Frank Haws, Thomas Jones, and La Paz County ("County Defendants") filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Jack Kimm (Kimm) responded at docket 154. County Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases