NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. JUDGE WAREHOUSING, LLC

Case No. CV416-265.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. JUDGE WAREHOUSING, LLC, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff, and Counter-Defendant, v. CENTERPOINT GARDEN CITY LLC, Counter-Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division.

October 23, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman - Clayton Act
Nature of Suit: 450 Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Plaintiff, represented by J. Curt Thomas , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey D. Cohen , Keenan, Cohen & Merrick, P.C., pro hac vice, Robert S.D. Pace , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP & Christopher J. Merrick , Keenan, Cohen & Howard, PC.

Judge Warehousing, LLC, Defendant, represented by Jason Carl Pedigo , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP & Philip M. Thompson , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP.

Judge Warehousing, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Jason Carl Pedigo , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP & Philip M. Thompson , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Christopher J. Merrick , Keenan, Cohen & Howard, PC, pro hac vice, J. Curt Thomas , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP & Travis D. Windsor , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP.

Judge Warehousing, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Jason Carl Pedigo , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP & Philip M. Thompson , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Christopher J. Merrick , Keenan, Cohen & Howard, PC, J. Curt Thomas , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP & Travis D. Windsor , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP.

Judge Warehousing, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Jason Carl Pedigo , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP & Philip M. Thompson , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP.


ORDER

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice. (Doc. 42.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) (ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." As requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases