1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PEARLSTEIN v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED
 

PEARLSTEIN v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED

No. 13-CV-7060 (TPG).

MARVIN PEARLSTEIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Cox & Mary Dinzik, Lead Plaintiff, represented by Kim Elaine Miller, Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC.

Marvin Pearlstein, Plaintiff, represented by Bruce Whitney Dona, Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC & Kim Elaine Miller, Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC.

Yong M. Cho, Plaintiff, represented by David A.P. Brower, Brower Piven.

Batuhan Ulug, Plaintiff, represented by David A.P. Brower, Brower Piven.

Omar Ahmed, Movant, represented by Peter George Safirstein, Morgan & Morgan, P.C..

The BlackBerry Limited Investor Group, Movant, represented by The BlackBerry Limited Investor Group.

Mark Katz, Movant, represented by Gregory Bradley Linkh, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP.

Blackberry Limited, Defendant, represented by Joel Charles Haims, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Dan Edward Marmalefsky, Morrison & Foerster, James Joseph Beha, II, Morrison & Foerster LLP & Jordan Eth, Morrison & Foerster LLP.

Thorsten Heins, Defendant, represented by Joel Charles Haims, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Dan Edward Marmalefsky, Morrison & Foerster, James Joseph Beha, II, Morrison & Foerster LLP & Jordan Eth, Morrison & Foerster LLP.

Brian Bidulka, Defendant, represented by Joel Charles Haims, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Dan Edward Marmalefsky, Morrison & Foerster, James Joseph Beha, II, Morrison & Foerster LLP & Jordan Eth, Morrison & Foerster LLP.

OPINION

Before this court is a motion to amend, originally sought as part of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this court's March 13, 2015 opinion. ECF Nos. 54, 56. The court reconsiders plaintiff's motion to amend pursuant to the Second Circuit's August 24, 2016 mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases