RYDER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Civil Action No. 15-431-SDD-EWD.

MICHAEL TODD RYDER, ET AL v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana.

September 29, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Todd Ryder, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Mark Miller , Davis, Saunders, Miller & Oden.

Michael Todd Ryder, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin B. Saunders , Davis, Saunders & Miller, PLC, Carisa Renee German-Oden , Davis, Saunders & Miller, Nathan L. Karlin , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice & Robert L. Pottroff , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice.

Lori Powell, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Mark Miller , Davis, Saunders, Miller & Oden, Benjamin B. Saunders , Davis, Saunders & Miller, PLC, Carisa Renee German-Oden , Davis, Saunders & Miller, Nathan L. Karlin , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice & Robert L. Pottroff , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice.

Nell Theresa Ryder, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Mark Miller , Davis, Saunders, Miller & Oden, Benjamin B. Saunders , Davis, Saunders & Miller, PLC, Carisa Renee German-Oden , Davis, Saunders & Miller, Nathan L. Karlin , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice & Robert L. Pottroff , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice.

Herbert Paul Barras, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Mark Miller , Davis, Saunders, Miller & Oden, Benjamin B. Saunders , Davis, Saunders & Miller, PLC, Carisa Renee German-Oden , Davis, Saunders & Miller, Nathan L. Karlin , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice & Robert L. Pottroff , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice.

Lisa Barras, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Mark Miller , Davis, Saunders, Miller & Oden, Benjamin B. Saunders , Davis, Saunders & Miller, PLC, Carisa Renee German-Oden , Davis, Saunders & Miller, Nathan L. Karlin , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice & Robert L. Pottroff , Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, pro hac vice.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant, represented by Kevin M. Dills , Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier & McElligott, David Andrew Fraser , Fraser, Wheeler & Bergstedt, L.L.P. & John E. McElligott, Jr. , Davidson Meaux Sonnier McElligott Fontenot Gideon & Edwards.

Union Pacific Railroad Corporation, Defendant, represented by Kevin M. Dills , Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier & McElligott, David Andrew Fraser , Fraser, Wheeler & Bergstedt, L.L.P. & John E. McElligott, Jr. , Davidson Meaux Sonnier McElligott Fontenot Gideon & Edwards.

Kinder Morgan G.P. Inc., Defendant, represented by Thomas Joseph Smith , Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith & Jason E. Wilson , Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith.

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Defendant, represented by Thomas Joseph Smith , Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith & Jason E. Wilson , Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith.

Pipeline Construction & Maintenance, Inc., Intervenor, represented by Jonathan A. Tweedy , BrownSims, P.C., Kelly Frances Walsh , Brown Sims & Michael Thomas Wawrzycki , Brown Sims.

Zurich American Insurance Company, Intervenor, represented by Jonathan A. Tweedy , BrownSims, P.C., Kelly Frances Walsh , Brown Sims & Michael Thomas Wawrzycki , Brown Sims.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Kevin M. Dills , Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier & McElligott, David Andrew Fraser , Fraser, Wheeler & Bergstedt, L.L.P. & John E. McElligott, Jr. , Davidson Meaux Sonnier McElligott Fontenot Gideon & Edwards.

Union Pacific Railroad Corporation, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Kevin M. Dills , Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier & McElligott, David Andrew Fraser , Fraser, Wheeler & Bergstedt, L.L.P. & John E. McElligott, Jr. , Davidson Meaux Sonnier McElligott Fontenot Gideon & Edwards.


RULING

Before the Court are two Motions for Partial Summary Judgment1 filed by Defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UP"). Plaintiffs filed Oppositions2, to which Defendant filed Replies.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases