1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
 

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.

No. 8:12CV123.

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., D/B/A SPRINT PCS, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

September 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prism Technologies, Plaintiff, represented by Aakash B. Jariwala , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice.

Prism Technologies, Plaintiff, represented by Aaron M. Frankel , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Andre J. Bahou , PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Cristina Martinez , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Daniel J. Fischer , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Jonathan S. Caplan , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Lisa Kobialka , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Marcus A. Colucci , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Mark A. Baghdassarian , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Matthew W. Olinzock , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Michael C. Cox , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM & Paul Andre , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice.

Sprint Spectrum L.P., Defendant, represented by B. Trent Webb , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, Beth A. Larigan , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Carrie S. Dolton , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM, Christopher Hanba , K&L GATES LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Irene I. Yang , SIDLEY, AUSTIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Jesse J. Camacho , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, John D. Garretson , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Margaux L. Nair , K&L GATES LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Mary J. Peal , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Michael J. Bettinger , SIDLEY, AUSTIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice & Michael T. Hilgers , HILGERS, GRABEN LAW FIRM.

AT&T Mobility Interested Party, represented by David R. Clonts , AKIN, GUMP LAW FIRM.

Sprint Spectrum L.P., Counter Claimant, represented by B. Trent Webb , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, Beth A. Larigan , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Carrie S. Dolton , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM, Christopher Hanba , K&L GATES LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Irene I. Yang , SIDLEY, AUSTIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Jesse J. Camacho , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, John D. Garretson , SHOOK, HARDY LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Margaux L. Nair , K&L GATES LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Michael J. Bettinger , SIDLEY, AUSTIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice & Michael T. Hilgers , HILGERS, GRABEN LAW FIRM.

Prism Technologies, Counter Defendant, represented by Aakash B. Jariwala , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Aaron M. Frankel , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Andre J. Bahou , PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Cristina Martinez , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Daniel J. Fischer , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Jonathan S. Caplan , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Lisa Kobialka , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Marcus A. Colucci , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Mark A. Baghdassarian , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Matthew W. Olinzock , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice, Michael C. Cox , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM & Paul Andre , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 (Filing No. 637). The Court has reviewed plaintiff's brief in support of said motion (Filing No. 638) and its index of evidence (Filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases