1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 265 F.Supp.3d
  5. 265 F.Supp.3d 410 (2017)
 

RONNIE VAN ZANT, INC. v. PYLE

17 Civ. 3360 (RWS).

265 F.Supp.3d 410 (2017)

RONNIE VAN ZANT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Artimus PYLE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pauline McTernan, Richard Gerard Haddad, Otterbourg P.C., Sandor Frankel, Frankel & Abrams, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Evan Mandel, Robert Allen Glunt, Mandel Bhandari, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

In its Opinion and Order dated August 23, 2017 (the "Opinion," Dkt. No. 61), the Court determined, inter alia, that Defendants Cleopatra Records, Inc. ("Cleopatra Records"), Cleopatra Films (together with Cleopatra Records, "Cleopatra"), and Artimus Pyle ("Pyle" and, together with Cleopatra, the "Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases