1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EGGLESTON v. DANIELS
 

EGGLESTON v. DANIELS

Case No. 15-11893.

SOPHIA EGGLESTON, Plaintiff, v. LEE DANIELS, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

September 11, 2017.

Editors Note
Cause: No cause code entered
Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sophia Eggleston, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Lee Daniels, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Thomas , Jenner & Block LLP, J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Richard L. Stone , Jenner & Block, LLP & Sarah E. Waidelich , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP.

Danny Strong, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Thomas , Jenner & Block LLP, J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Richard L. Stone , Jenner & Block, LLP & Sarah E. Waidelich , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP.

Malcolm Spellman, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Thomas , Jenner & Block LLP, J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Richard L. Stone , Jenner & Block, LLP & Sarah E. Waidelich , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Thomas , Jenner & Block LLP, J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Richard L. Stone , Jenner & Block, LLP & Sarah E. Waidelich , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP.

Fox Broadcasting Company, Defendant, represented by Andrew J. Thomas , Jenner & Block LLP, J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Richard L. Stone , Jenner & Block, LLP & Sarah E. Waidelich , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP.

Felix Walls, Movant, Pro Se.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RE-OPEN (Dkt. 81), GRANTING COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Dkt. 93), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS TO GRANT TESTIMONY (Dkt. 87, 88, 89, 90, 92)

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Sophia Eggleston ("Plaintiff" or "Eggleston") had sued the FOX Broadcasting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases