Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Marc Aaron Fenster, Russ, August & Kabat.
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Andrew D. Weiss, Russ August & Kabat, Benjamin T. Wang, Attorney at Law, Brian David Ledahl, Russ August & Kabat, Jacob Robert Buczko, Russ August and Kabat, Neil Alan Rubin, Russ August & Kabat & Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ, August & Kabat.
Apple, Inc., Defendant, represented by Clayton Cole James, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Aaron Stafford Oakley, Hogan Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice, Alali Dagogo-Jack, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Helen Yiea Trac, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Jane Zenzi Li Carter, Hogan Lovells LLP, Katherine A. Nelson, Hogan Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice & Srecko Vidmar, Hogan Lovells US LLP.
Apple, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Clayton Cole James, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Srecko Vidmar, Hogan Lovells US LLP.
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Marc Aaron Fenster, Russ, August & Kabat, Andrew D. Weiss, Russ August & Kabat, Neil Alan Rubin, Russ August & Kabat & Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ, August & Kabat.
Apple, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Clayton Cole James, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Srecko Vidmar, Hogan Lovells US LLP.
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Marc Aaron Fenster, Russ, August & Kabat, Andrew D. Weiss, Russ August & Kabat, Neil Alan Rubin, Russ August & Kabat & Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ, August & Kabat.
Apple, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Clayton Cole James, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Alali Dagogo-Jack, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Helen Yiea Trac, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Jane Zenzi Li Carter, Hogan Lovells LLP & Srecko Vidmar, Hogan Lovells US LLP.
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Marc Aaron Fenster, Russ, August & Kabat, Andrew D. Weiss, Russ August & Kabat, Brian David Ledahl, Russ August & Kabat, Neil Alan Rubin, Russ August & Kabat & Paul Anthony Kroeger, Russ, August & Kabat.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant in this patent infringement action moves for judgment on the pleadings on the basis that the second amended complaint fails to state a claim for relief. The motion is DENIED.
STATEMENT
The procedural...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
