1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HURT v. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
 

HURT v. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.

Case No. 1:12-CV-758.

DAVINA HURT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio.

August 10, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davina Hurt, Plaintiff, represented by David Aron Katz.

Davina Hurt, Plaintiff, represented by Frank A. Bartela, Dworken & Bernstein, Murray Richelson, Law Office of David A. Katz, Nicole T. Fiorelli, Dworken & Bernstein, Patrick J. Perotti, Dworken & Bernstein, James A. DeRoche, Garson Johnson, Kristen M. Kraus, Dworken & Bernstein & Richard N. Selby, II, Dworken & Bernstein.

Dominic Hill, Plaintiff, represented by David Aron Katz. Frank A. Bartela, Dworken & Bernstein, Murray Richelson, Law Office of David A. Katz, Nicole T. Fiorelli, Dworken & Bernstein, Patrick J. Perotti, Dworken & Bernstein, Kristen M. Kraus, Dworken & Bernstein & Richard N. Selby, II, Dworken & Bernstein.

Commerce Energy, Inc, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L. Schilling, Littler Mendelson, Alexander R. Frondorf, Littler Mendelson, Bradley A. Sherman, Littler Mendelson, Edward H. Chyun, Littler Mendelson, Robert M. Wolff, Littler Mendelson & Shannon K. Patton, Littler Mendelson.

Just Energy Marketing Corp, Defendant, represented by Jennifer L. Schilling, Littler Mendelson, Alexander R. Frondorf, Littler Mendelson, Bradley A. Sherman, Littler Mendelson, Edward H. Chyun, Littler Mendelson, Robert M. Wolff, Littler Mendelson & Shannon K. Patton, Littler Mendelson.

Just Energy Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jennifer L. Schilling, Littler Mendelson, Alexander R. Frondorf, Littler Mendelson, Bradley A. Sherman, Littler Mendelson, Edward H. Chyun, Littler Mendelson, Robert M. Wolff, Littler Mendelson & Shannon K. Patton, Littler Mendelson.

OPINION AND ORDER

[Resolving Doc. Nos. 863, 868, & 870]

With this decision, the Court considers whether certain plaintiffs forfeited their claim for minimum wages and overtime when those plaintiffs missed a survey response deadline.

Under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases