1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ACOSTA v. DeWALT
 

ACOSTA v. DeWALT

No. 2:17-CV-0082-TOR.

R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DEWALT; ROBERT G. BAKIE; JACK L. FALLIS, JR.; JEFFREY A. BARTON; ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; THE ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST; and THE ASSOCIATED EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Washington.

July 31, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R Alexander Acosta, Plaintiff, represented by D. Marc Sarata, US Department of Labor.

R Alexander Acosta, Plaintiff, represented by Eirik James Cheverud, United States Department of Labor & Peter B. Dolan, United States Department of Labor.

James DeWalt, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Robert G Bakie, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Jack L Fallis, Jr, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Jeffery A Barton, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Associated Industries Management Services Inc, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Associated Industries of the Inland Northwest, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

Associated Employers Health and Welfare Trust, Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Amert, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Christopher J. Rillo, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Enfield, Jenner & Block LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas W. McLane, Randall & Danskin PS.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

BEFORE THE COURT are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. 12) and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 15). These matters were submitted for consideration with oral argument. The Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases