FRANK URIARTE, RUDY ALARCON, LUIS CASILLAS, STEVEN GARCIA, GERMAN DURAN, GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, ISAIAS NAVARRO, and STEPHEN FRAZIER, Plaintiffs,
v.
MICHAEL BOSTIC, CITY OF CALEXICO, RICHARD WARNE, and GONZALO C. GERARDO, Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 7, 2017.
August 7, 2017.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983cv
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph Bielma, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Frank Uriarte, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Rudy Alarcon, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Luis Casillas, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Steven Garcia, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
German Duran, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Gabriel Rodriguez, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Isaias Navarro, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Stephen Frazier, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Andrew McGill, Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone.
Michael Bostic, Defendant, represented by Michael T. Gibbs, Gibbs and Fuerst.
Richard Warne, Defendant, represented by Michael T. Gibbs, Gibbs and Fuerst.
City of Calexico, Defendant, represented by Michael T. Gibbs, Gibbs and Fuerst.
Gonzalo C. Gerardo, Defendant, represented by Michael T. Gibbs, Gibbs and Fuerst.
Maritza Hurtado, Defendant, represented by Michael T. Gibbs, Gibbs and Fuerst.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
[Doc. No. 52]
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
On May 26, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (SAC), and granted Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims pursuant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
