1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CHAHAL v. LONERGAN
 

CHAHAL v. LONERGAN

Case No. 17-CV-01036-LHK.

GURBAKSH CHAHAL, Plaintiff, v. BILL LONERGAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

July 10, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 160 Stockholders Suits
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gurbaksh Chahal, Plaintiff, represented by Gabriel G. Gregg , Rimon.

Gurbaksh Chahal, Plaintiff, represented by Imran A. Khaliq , Rimon, P.C..

Bill Lonergan, Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

David Silverman, Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

Ajay Chopra, Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

Steve Westly, Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

Robin Murray, Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

RadiumOne, Inc., Defendant, represented by Kathleen Howard Goodhart , Cooley LLP, Amy McCowan Smith , Cooley LLP, Jeffrey Michael Kaban , Cooley LLP, Kyle Christopher Wong , Cooley LLP & Patrick Edward Gibbs , Cooley LLP.

ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Re: Dkt Nos. 39, 40, 51, 54

On May 31, 2017, the Court granted a stay of discovery. ECF No. 36. The only basis for that stay of discovery was Plaintiff's shareholder derivative causes of action. On June 16, 2017, the Court granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases