SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY v. COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01137-MJS.

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

July 7, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherwin-Williams Company, Plaintiff, represented by George S. Fish , Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, PC, pro hac vice.

Sherwin-Williams Company, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory Scott Mason , McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth LLP, Jeffrey D. Wilson , Young Basile Hanion & MacFarlane, PC, pro hac vice & Natasha M. Lockhart , Young Basile Hanion & MacFarlane, PC, pro hac vice.

Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc., Defendant, represented by Mary E. Krugh , Quall Cardot Llp & Matthew W. Quall , Quall, Cardot, LLP.

Ben Wells, Defendant, represented by Mary E. Krugh , Quall Cardot Llp & Matthew W. Quall , Quall, Cardot, LLP.


ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS

(ECF NO. 72)

I. Procedural History

On March 31, 2017, the parties requested a stay of the deadline to file dispositive motions on the ground that they had reached a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases