1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. X
 

SPACE DATA CORPORATION v. X

Case No. 16-cv-03260-BLF.

SPACE DATA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. X, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

July 5, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Space Data Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Spencer Hosie, Hosie Rice LLP.

Space Data Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Darrell Rae Atkinson, Hosie Rice LLP, Diane Sue Rice, Hosie Rice LLP, Hemant Keeto Sabharwal, Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox PLLC, pro hac vice & Lyndsey C. Heaton, Hosie Rice LLP.

X, Defendant, represented by Robert Addy Van Nest, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Christa M. Anderson, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Eugene Morris Paige, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Leah Maxx Pransky, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Matthew Mickle Werdegar, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Matthias Andreas Kamber, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Thomas Edward Gorman, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Alphabet Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert Addy Van Nest, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Andrew Stephen Bruns, Keker Van Nest and Peters, Christa M. Anderson, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Eugene Morris Paige, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Leah Maxx Pransky, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Matthew Mickle Werdegar, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Matthias Andreas Kamber, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Thomas Edward Gorman, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Google Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert Addy Van Nest, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Andrew Stephen Bruns, Keker Van Nest and Peters, Christa M. Anderson, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Eugene Morris Paige, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Leah Maxx Pransky, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, Matthew Mickle Werdegar, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Matthias Andreas Kamber, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP & Thomas Edward Gorman, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

ORDER GRANTING SEALING MOTION

[Re: ECF 130]

Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to file under seal portions of its exhibits in support of its motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. ECF 130. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases