1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. VIGDOR v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.
 

VIGDOR v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-05326-HSG.

DAN VIGDOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 23, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Vigdor, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Horwitz, Michelman and Robinson.

Dan Vigdor, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew F. Murray, Michelman Robinson & Marc Russell Jacobs, Michelman Robinson LLP.

Stephen Bradway, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Horwitz, Michelman and Robinson, Matthew F. Murray, Michelman Robinson & Marc Russell Jacobs, Michelman Robinson LLP.

Super Lucky Casino, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benedict Y. Hur, Attorney at Law & Julia Lees Allen, Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Nicholas Talarico, Defendant, represented by Benedict Y. Hur, Attorney at Law & Julia Lees Allen, Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 29

Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Super Lucky Casinos, Inc. and its President and Founder, Nicholas Talarico ("Defendants"). Dkt. No. 29 ("FAC"). For the reasons detailed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases