1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CITY OF NEODESHA v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC.
 

CITY OF NEODESHA v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC.

Consolidated Civil Actions Nos. 15-4025-KHV through 15-4844-KHV, No. 15-4847-KHV, Consolidated under and No. 15-4847-KHV, No. 15-4025-KHV.

CITY OF NEODESHA, Plaintiff, v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC., BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

June 15, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Torts to Land
Nature of Suit: 240 Torts to Land
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

City of Neodesha, Kansas, Plaintiff, represented by David W. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC.

City of Neodesha, Kansas, Plaintiff, represented by John M. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC, Justice B. King , Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, LLP & Matthew J. Limoli , Edgar Law Firm, LLC.

BP Corporation North America Inc, Defendant, represented by Arthur S. Chalmers , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Catherine L. Fitzpatrick , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Cory R. Buck , Case Linden, PC, F. James Robinson, Jr. , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Jeffrey B. Clark , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Mark S. Lillie , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Godfrey , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Hite , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Scott W. Fowkes , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice & Stephen H. Netherton , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP.

BP Corporation North America Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Arthur S. Chalmers , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Catherine L. Fitzpatrick , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Cory R. Buck , Case Linden, PC, F. James Robinson, Jr. , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Jeffrey B. Clark , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Mark S. Lillie , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Godfrey , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Hite , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Scott W. Fowkes , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice & Stephen H. Netherton , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP.

City of Neodesha, Kansas, Counter Defendant, represented by David W. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC, John M. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC, Justice B. King , Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, LLP & Matthew J. Limoli , Edgar Law Firm, LLC.

BP Corporation North America Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Arthur S. Chalmers , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Catherine L. Fitzpatrick , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Cory R. Buck , Case Linden, PC, F. James Robinson, Jr. , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Jeffrey B. Clark , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Mark S. Lillie , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Godfrey , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice, Richard C. Hite , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP, Scott W. Fowkes , Kirkland & Ellis, pro hac vice & Stephen H. Netherton , Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP.

City of Neodesha, Kansas, Counter Defendant, represented by David W. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC, John M. Edgar , Edgar Law Firm, LLC & Matthew J. Limoli , Edgar Law Firm, LLC.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on BP Corporation North America Inc.'s Rule 12(c) Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings (Doc. #21) filed June 6, 2016 and BP's oral motion to dismiss with prejudice under Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases