THE STATE OF INDIANA, ex rel. HARMEYER, Plaintiffs and Qui Tam Relator,
v.
THE KROGER CO., KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, KRGP, INC., PAY LESS SUPER MARKETS, INC., and RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 13, 2017.
June 13, 2017.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 370 Other Fraud Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
THE STATE OF INDIANA, ex rel. HARMEYER, Plaintiff, represented by James B. Helmer, Jr., HELMER, MARTINS, RICE, POPHAM CO., LPA.
THE STATE OF INDIANA, ex rel. HARMEYER, Plaintiff, represented by James A. Tate, HELMER, MARTINS, RICE, POPHAM CO., LPA, Julie W. Popham, HELMER, MARTINS, RICE, POPHAM CO., LPA, Michael D. Harmeyer, HARMEYER LAW FIRM LLC & Paul B. Martins, HELMER, MARTINS, RICE, POPHAM CO., LPA.
Michael D Harmeyer, Relator, represented by James A. Tate, HELMER, MARTINS, RICE, POPHAM CO., LPA.
THE KROGER CO., Defendant, represented by Christina M. Kamelhair, SMITH FISHER MAAS HOWARD & LLOYD, P.C. & Kimberly E. Howard, SMITH FISHER MAAS & HOWARD, P.C..
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Defendant, represented by Christina M. Kamelhair, SMITH FISHER MAAS HOWARD & LLOYD, P.C. & Kimberly E. Howard, SMITH FISHER MAAS & HOWARD, P.C..
KRGP, INC., Defendant, represented by Christina M. Kamelhair, SMITH FISHER MAAS HOWARD & LLOYD, P.C. & Kimberly E. Howard, SMITH FISHER MAAS & HOWARD, P.C..
PAY LESS SUPER MARKETS, INC., Defendant, represented by Christina M. Kamelhair, SMITH FISHER MAAS HOWARD & LLOYD, P.C. & Kimberly E. Howard, SMITH FISHER MAAS & HOWARD, P.C..
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, Defendant, represented by Christina M. Kamelhair, SMITH FISHER MAAS HOWARD & LLOYD, P.C. & Kimberly E. Howard, SMITH FISHER MAAS & HOWARD, P.C..
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
On February 21, 2017, Defendants The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership I, KRGP, Inc., Pay Less Super Markets, Inc., and Ralphs Grocery Company filed a Notice of Removal in which they claimed that this case could be removed to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
