1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSON v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
 

JOHNSON v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00517-WHO.

SHERIDA JOHNSON, HARRY GUNSENHOUSER, and SUBRINA SEENARAIN on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. and NISSAN MOTOR CO. LTD., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

June 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 385 Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherida Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Crystal Gayle Foley , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC.

Sherida Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Adam A. Edwards , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Gregory F. Coleman , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Lisa A. White , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mark E. Silvey , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mitchell M. Breit , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC & Paul J. Hanly, Jr. , Simmons Hanly Conry LLC.

Harry Gunsenhouser, Plaintiff, represented by Crystal Gayle Foley , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC, Adam A. Edwards , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Gregory F. Coleman , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Lisa A. White , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mark E. Silvey , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mitchell M. Breit , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC & Paul J. Hanly, Jr. , Simmons Hanly Conry LLC.

Subrina Seenarain, Plaintiff, represented by Crystal Gayle Foley , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC, Adam A. Edwards , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Gregory F. Coleman , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Lisa A. White , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mark E. Silvey , Greg Coleman Law PC, pro hac vice, Mitchell M. Breit , Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC & Paul J. Hanly, Jr. , Simmons Hanly Conry LLC.

Nissan North America, Inc., Defendant, represented by Amir M. Nassihi , Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. & Mr. William Roth Sampson , Shook, Hardy and Bacon LLP, pro hac vice.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick's Case Management Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases