1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 251 F.Supp.3d
  5. 251 F.Supp.3d 1187 (2017)
 

CUNNINGHAM v. RAPID RESPONSE MONITORING SERVICES

NO. 3:15-cv-00846.

251 F.Supp.3d 1187 (2017)

Craig CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. RAPID RESPONSE MONITORING SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

Signed April 26, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig Cunningham, Nashville, TN, pro se.

Michael T. Schmitt, Ortale, Kelley, Herbert & Crawford, David A. Changas, Lewis, Thomason, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C., Nashville, TN, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("R & R") (Doc. No. 81) making the following recommendations:

1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 58) filed by Defendants Rapid Response Monitoring Services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases