1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BROUSSARD v. 3M COMPANY
 

BROUSSARD v. 3M COMPANY

Case No. 1-16-cv-00462-SEH.

SHIRLEY BROUSSARD, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND/OR ITS PREDECESSORS/ SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 6, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shirley Broussard, Plaintiff, represented by Michael B. Martin , Martin Walton Law Firm.

Shirley Broussard, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen L. Backus , Backus & Ernst. LLP.

3M Company, Defendant, represented by Daniel Henry Solomon , Dentons US LLP, David Ahmad Rawi , Dentons US LLP & Mordecai D. Boone , Dentons Us LLP.

ORDER

The Scheduling Order of June 27, 2016, required both parties to disclose experts on or before January 30, 2017, and rebuttal experts on or before February 27, 2017. (Doc. No. 13 at 3). Such disclosures were ordered to be in writing and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C)....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases