IMPERIUM IP HOLDINGS (CAYMAN), LTD. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-00371.

IMPERIUM IP HOLDINGS (CAYMAN), LTD. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division.

April 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hon. David Folsom, Mediator, Pro Se, pro hac vice.

David Keyzer, Technical Advisor, Pro Se.

Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by David Michael Saunders , Fisch Sigler LLP, Jeffrey Saltman , Fisch Sigler LLP, pro hac vice, John T. Battaglia , Fisch Sigler LLP, pro hac vice, Roy William Sigler , Fisch Sigler LLP, pro hac vice, S. Desmond Jui , Fisch Sigler LLP, Silvia Jordan , Fisch Sigler LLP, pro hac vice, Sruli Yellin , Fisch Sigler LLP & Alan Michael Fisch , Fisch Sigler LLP.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Defendant, represented by Jesse J. Jenner , Ropes & Gray, Alexander Ernest Middleton , Ropes & Gray LLP, Christopher John Harnett , Ropes & Gray LLP, Clyde Moody Siebman , Siebman Burg Phillips & Smith LLP, Courtney Marie Cox , Ropes & Gray LLP - Boston, John Frederick Bufe , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation, Kevin John Post , Ropes & Gray LLP, Matthew Richard Shapiro , Ropes & Gray LLP, Rebecca R. Carrizosa , Ropes & Gray - East Palo Alto, Samuel Lawrence Brenner , Ropes & Gray LLP - Boston, Scott Stephen Taylor , Ropes & Gray LLP - Boston, Steven Pepe , Ropes & Gray LLP & Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jesse J. Jenner , Ropes & Gray, Alexander Ernest Middleton , Ropes & Gray LLP, Christopher John Harnett , Ropes & Gray LLP, Clyde Moody Siebman , Siebman Burg Phillips & Smith LLP, Courtney Marie Cox , Ropes & Gray LLP, John Frederick Bufe , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation, Kevin John Post , Ropes & Gray LLP, Matthew Richard Shapiro , Ropes & Gray LLP, Rebecca R. Carrizosa , Ropes & Gray, Samuel Lawrence Brenner , Ropes & Gray LLP, Scott Stephen Taylor , Ropes & Gray LLP, Steven Pepe , Ropes & Gray LLP & Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC, Defendant, represented by Jesse J. Jenner , Ropes & Gray, Christopher John Harnett , Ropes & Gray LLP, Clyde Moody Siebman , Siebman Burg Phillips & Smith LLP, Samuel Lawrence Brenner , Ropes & Gray LLP, Scott Stephen Taylor , Ropes & Gray LLP, Steven Pepe , Ropes & Gray LLP & Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jesse J. Jenner , Ropes & Gray, Alexander Ernest Middleton , Ropes & Gray LLP, Christopher John Harnett , Ropes & Gray LLP, Clyde Moody Siebman , Siebman Burg Phillips & Smith LLP, Courtney Marie Cox , Ropes & Gray LLP, John Frederick Bufe , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation, Kevin John Post , Ropes & Gray LLP, Matthew Richard Shapiro , Ropes & Gray LLP, Rebecca R. Carrizosa , Ropes & Gray, Samuel Lawrence Brenner , Ropes & Gray LLP, Scott Stephen Taylor , Ropes & Gray LLP, Steven Pepe , Ropes & Gray LLP & Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Counter Claimant, represented by Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Michael E. Jones , Potter Minton, a Professional Corporation.

Imperium IP Holdings, Ltd., Counter Defendant, represented by Alan Michael Fisch , Fisch Sigler LLP & Alan Michael Fisch , Fisch Sigler LLP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Judgment and for Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest (Dkt. #335). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases