REMARK ENTERPRISES LLC v. MECOTEC GMBH

Case No. 2:16-cv-00755-JAM-CKD.

REMARK ENTERPRISES LLC and, US CRYOTHERAPY DIRECT SALES LLC, Plaintiffs, v. MECOTEC GMBH and MECOTEC SALES GMBH, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

May 8, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Remark Enterprises LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Martin Niels Jensen, Porter Scott.

US Cryotherapy Direct Sales LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Martin Niels Jensen, Porter Scott.

Mecotec GMBH, Defendant, represented by Matthew S. Kenefick, Jeffer Mangels Butler and Marmaro LLP & Whitney E. Fair, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, LLP.

Mecotec Sales GMBH, Defendant, represented by Matthew S. Kenefick, Jeffer Mangels Butler and Marmaro LLP & Whitney E. Fair, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, LLP.


STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE ADMISSION OF ICC ARBITRATION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL

Plaintiffs, Remark Enterprises LLC, US Cryotherapy Direct Sales LLC, and Defendants, Mecotec GmbH, and Mecotec Sales GmbH (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases