1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PIPITONE v. CAMP, DRESSER AND McKEE
 

PIPITONE v. CAMP, DRESSER AND McKEE

No. 5:16-cv-03777.

LYNARE PIPITONE and NATHAN PIPITONE, Plaintiffs, v. CAMP, DRESSER AND MCKEE, also known as CDM Smith, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LYNARE PIPITONE, Plaintiff, represented by JILL E. NAGY , SUMMERS NAGY LAW OFFICES.

LYNARE PIPITONE, Plaintiff, represented by SEAN E. SUMMERS , SUMMERS NAGY LAW OFFICE.

NATHAN PIPITONE, Plaintiff, represented by JILL E. NAGY , SUMMERS NAGY LAW OFFICES & SEAN E. SUMMERS , SUMMERS NAGY LAW OFFICE.

CAMP, DRESSER AND MCKEE, Defendant, represented by DANIEL J. MCGRAVEY , CLARK HILL PLC, LAURI A. KAVULICH , CLARK HILL PLC & STEPHANIE K. RAWITT , CLARK HILL THORP REED.

OPINION

Defendant CDM Smith's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19 — Granted

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs Lynare and Nathan Pipitone are developers who planned to construct a residential unit in Pequea Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases