1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROGERS v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 689
 

ROGERS v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 689

Case No. 1:14-cv-01650 (APM).

CHARLES H. ROGERS, JR., Plaintiff, v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 689, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 01 U.S.C. § 2439
Cause: 01 U.S.C. § 2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CHARLES H. ROGERS, JR., Plaintiff, represented by John Edward Williams , LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. WILLIAMS, ESQ..

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 689, Defendant, represented by Douglas Taylor , GROMFINE, TAYLOR AND TYLER & Brian Connolly , GROMFINE, TAYLOR AND TYLER.

WMATA, Defendant, represented by Gerard Joseph Stief , WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 4, 2017, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 689's Motion for Attorney's Fees ("Fees Motion"). Mem. Op. and Order, ECF No. 47 [hereinafter Fees Mem. Op.]. The court treated Local 689's Fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases