1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROE v. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORPORATION
 

ROE v. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORPORATION

Case No. 3:16-cv-05801-WHO.

JANE ROE, Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORPORATION, VERIFICATIONS, INC., and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 24, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Roe, Plaintiff, represented by Craig Davis , Law Offices of Craig Davis.

First Advantage Background Services Corporation, Defendant, represented by Eric Michael Lloyd , Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Frederick Thomas Smith , Seyfarth Shaw, LLP & Megan Hall Poonolly , Seyfarth Shaw, LLP.

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS [L.R. 6-2]

Pursuant to Rule 6-2 of the Civil Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties to the above-entitled action, Plaintiff JANE ROE and Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases