JOHNSON SAFETY, INC. v. VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Case No. 5:14-cv-02591-ODW (DTBx).

JOHNSON SAFETY, INC., Plaintiff, v. VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; VOXX ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; and INVISION AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

April 17, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson Safety Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Kenya LaVerne Williams , Fulwider Patton LLP.

Johnson Safety Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew S. Compton, Jr. , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice, Matthew J.M. Prebeg , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice, Stephen W. Abbott , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice & LaVern Schooley , Fulwider Patton LLP.

Voxx International Corporation, Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Voxx Electronics Corporation, Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Invision Automotive Systems Inc, Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Invision Automotive Systems Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Voxx Electronics Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Voxx International Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Johnson Safety Inc, Counter Defendant, represented by James Juo , Fulwider Patton LLP, Kenya LaVerne Williams , Fulwider Patton LLP, Matthew S. Compton, Jr. , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Matthew J.M. Prebeg , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Stephen W. Abbott , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice & LaVern Schooley , Fulwider Patton LLP.

Johnson Safety Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by James Juo , Fulwider Patton LLP, Kenya LaVerne Williams , Fulwider Patton LLP, Matthew S. Compton, Jr. , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Matthew J.M. Prebeg , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Stephen W. Abbott , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice & LaVern Schooley , Fulwider Patton LLP.

Invision Automotive Systems Inc, Counter Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Voxx Electronics Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Voxx International Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.

Johnson Safety Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Kenya LaVerne Williams , Fulwider Patton LLP, Matthew S. Compton, Jr. , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Matthew J.M. Prebeg , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, Stephen W. Abbott , Prebeg Faucett and Abbott PLLC, pro hac vice & LaVern Schooley , Fulwider Patton LLP.

Voxx International Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by William J. Brown, Jr. , Brown Wegner McNamara LLP, Alastair J. Warr , FisherBroyles LLP, pro hac vice & Dean E. McConnell , Indiano and McConnell LLP, pro hac vice.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE [122]; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [134]; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [119]; and DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY [117]

I. INTRODUCTION

This suit involves cross-claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases