1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. INGENHUTT v. STATE FARM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
 

INGENHUTT v. STATE FARM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Case No. 1:15-cv-01303-JES-JEH.

AMY L. INGENHUTT and TERESA L. ODELL, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division.

April 17, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy L Ingenhutt, Plaintiff, represented by John Barton Goplerud , HUDSON MALLANEY SHINDLER & ANDERSON P.C..

Amy L. Ingenhutt, Plaintiff, represented by Ellen T. Noteware , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Kyle Geoffrey Bates , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Mark T. Johnson , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Michael C. McKay , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Shanon J. Carson , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Todd S. Collins , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Todd M. Schneider , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP & Garrett W. Wotkyns , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP.

Teresa L. Odell, Plaintiff, represented by John Barton Goplerud , HUDSON MALLANEY SHINDLER & ANDERSON P.C., Ellen T. Noteware , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Kyle Geoffrey Bates , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Mark T. Johnson , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Michael C. McKay , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Shanon J. Carson , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Todd S. Collins , BERGER & MONTAGUE PC, Todd M. Schneider , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP & Garrett W. Wotkyns , SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP.

State Farm Investment Management Corporation, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Skinner , ROPES & GRAY LLP, Amy D. Roy , ROPES & GRAY LLP, Nathan Bach , HEYL ROYSTER VOELKER & ALLEN & Timothy L. Bertschy , HEYL ROYSTER VOELKER & ALLEN.

ORDER AND OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 37) and Motion to Strike Declaration of Steve Pomerantz, Ph.D. (Doc. 39). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 37) and Motion to Strike (Doc. 39) are DENIED....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases