1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NOVARTIS AG v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
 

NOVARTIS AG v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC

C.A. Nos. 14-1487-LPS, 15-150-LPS, 15-151-LPS, 15-975-LPS

NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION; MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, and MITSUI SUGAR CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, V. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC; Defendant. NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, and MITSUI SUGAR CO., LTD., Piaintiffs, EZRA VENTURES, LLC, Defendant. NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, and MITSUI SUGAR CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v. HBC PHARM CO., LTD., HBC PHARM GROUP, and HBC PHARM USA INC., Defendants. NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, and MITSUI SUGAR CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v. APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

April 17, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Novartis AG, Plaintiff, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP.

Novartis AG, Plaintiff, represented by Alexander N. Harris , pro hac vice, Andrew Blythe , pro hac vice, Barish Ozdamar , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, pro hac vice, Beatrice Hahn , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, pro hac vice, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP, Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP, Jane M. Love , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, pro hac vice, Michael A. Valek , pro hac vice, Paul J. Kremer , pro hac vice & Robert W. Trenchard , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, pro hac vice.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Alexander N. Harris , pro hac vice, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP, Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP & Nao Takada , Paul Hastings LLP, pro hac vice.

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP, Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP & Nao Takada , Paul Hastings LLP, pro hac vice.

Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP, Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP & Nao Takada , Paul Hastings LLP, pro hac vice.

Apotex Inc., Defendant, represented by Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Dennis D. Gregory , pro hac vice, Mary Procaccio-Flowers , pro hac vice, Sami Sedghani , pro hac vice, Tung-On Kong , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professional Corporation, pro hac vice & David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Apotex Corp., Defendant, represented by Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Dennis D. Gregory , pro hac vice, Mary Procaccio-Flowers , pro hac vice & David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Apotex Corp., Counter Claimant, represented by David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Apotex Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP.

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP & Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP.

Mitsui Sugar Co., Ltd., Counter Defendant, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP & Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP.

Novartis AG, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP & Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael P. Kelly , McCarter & English, LLP, Benjamin A. Smyth , McCarter & English, LLP & Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

At Wilmington this 17th day of April, 2017, having reviewed the parties' proposed pretrial order (C.A. No. 14-14871 D.I. 275), including briefing on various motions in limine, and the parties' Daubert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases