1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LEVIN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
 

LEVIN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. 3:14-cv-03352-CRB.

DANIEL LEVIN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 10, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Levin, Plaintiff, represented by Jan David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation.

Daniel Levin, Plaintiff, represented by Jennifer Fry Thompson , Pacific Legal Foundation.

Maria Levin, Plaintiff, represented by Jan David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation & Jennifer Fry Thompson , Pacific Legal Foundation.

ParkLane Associates, L.P., Plaintiff, represented by Jan David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation & Jennifer Fry Thompson , Pacific Legal Foundation.

San Francisco Apartment Association, Plaintiff, represented by Jan David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation & Jennifer Fry Thompson , Pacific Legal Foundation.

Coalition for Better Housing, Plaintiff, represented by Jan David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation & Jennifer Fry Thompson , Pacific Legal Foundation.

City and County of San Francisco, Defendant, represented by Christine Van Aken , Office of the City Attorney.

Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute, Amicus, represented by Andrew Mayer Zacks , Zacks and Freedman & Ryan James Patterson , Zacks & Freedman, P.C..

Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Amicus, represented by Anthony Thomas Caso , Law Office of Anthony T. Caso.

Tenants Together, Amicus, represented by Michael Ezra Soloff , Munger Tolles and Olson & Joshua Patashnik , Munger, Tolles and Olson LLP.

San Francisco Association of Realtors, Amicus, represented by James Richard Parrinello , Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni LLP & James Warren Carson , Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross and Leoni LLP.

David Greene, Intervenor, represented by Lawrence Genaro Papale , Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale.

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The Court of Appeals remanded this case for the Court to determine, in the first instance, whether it should vacate its judgment in light of the City's adoption of a new ordinance. See COA Order (dkt. 127) at 2-3; Judgment (dkt. 93). The Court ORDERS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases